Real work is stored in a very structured and predictable fashion: the meta data. Way more interesting part is the fact that the Wissel on Tuesday 19 October 2010 they started with RichText, by now it is w3 standardized MIME. #Openoffice versus microsoft office iso#You mean your customer is using ISO unapproved Lotus Notes Richtext Posted by Henning Heinz on Tuesday 19 October 2010 AD: I can link you up with the German BP I was working with then. simply were a RichText and at "print" time the user could pick: Be a letter, be a fax, be an eMail, be an attachment to an email. Their trick was to have a separate module for print (Notes doesn't print as we all know it). One customer of mine - a decade ago - moved ALL letters from Office to Notes. In the end they got a standard that is NOT implemented in their own products.Īnd seriously: you can remove 90% of office needs when planning a little. Microsoft on the other hand pushed a document format through the ISO process using very questionable methods. Lotus Symphony uses the ISO approved ODF format, as does OpenOffice KOffice and a few others. More often than not you will process files in the backend without the office application installed. Wissel on Tuesday 19 October 2010 One important consideration for office packages is the file format. Even IBMer are not very keen helping you with Symphony. learning material) and in case IBM dumps Symphony then you are on your own. Even though we have Lotus Notes, Symphony is not an option for us. We are a large company and in the process of evaluating a new office suite (MS Office so far). Posted by Thilo Hamberger on Tuesday 19 October 2010 AD: Only Notes can do all of this and its Oh so cheep in comparison to anything else, especially MS Office. No more loosing documents when a local HD dies, or staff leave and delete important documents. #Openoffice versus microsoft office full#Notes full indexes the document so that it is really easy to find that information again. If its a presentation just pot the actual document into a doc lib record and everyone can share it. Its far quicker and easier and support everything that is needed for the type of document that people are talking about. Rather than using and MS Office or OOo or Symphony, just enter the text natively into a Notes document lib. You have eluded to Notes document databases not not mention them specifically. Posted by Nick Halliwell on Tuesday 19 October 2010 AD: Posted by Patrick Kwinten on Monday 18 October 2010 AD:Īfter paperless office I guess its time for officeless offices Then go and revisit your Office decision again. You will reach the point where your remaining document needs will be rather simple. While you are on it make sure all this tooling works well on mobile devices (office documents don't work well). Need to have a spreadsheet front-end to a database with concurrent editing capabilities? Try ZK Spreadsheet. #Openoffice versus microsoft office software#All these macro-infested spreadsheets that form the backbone of your monthly reporting would be better replaced by a dashboard, the tons of text document forming the requirements for that software project live happily in a WIKI and the progress reports are just fine in that blog. We have tons of tools, beginning with eMail, who try to make these office blobs flow nicely instead of starting with information flow in the beginning. All these stand-alone documents, living on users hard drives or in document repositories form little islands of poorly structured information that are more and more difficult to manage and maintain. However your real effort should go into a review: what office documents can be eradicated from your organisation. Now you can start arguing if that is given with. For the later group a package that allows to seamlessly interact with the first group makes sense. So for the first group the big question: what improvement would a new version bring? Most likely none given the way office documents are probably used. For old world economies the later group might not exist, so we have a clear emerging economy only problem at hand. You have two groups of users: your existing base with paid-for licences and new users who don't have an office licence yet. Which one would you pick and standardise on? My take: divide and conquer. Imagine for a moment you get hired as CTO or CIO of a large organization. The heat is on, Microsoft pushes against OpenOffice, Infoworld analyses the rationale behind the attack and Lotus Symphony is due for its version 3.0.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |